Late last year, a similar scandal hit medical device companies.
The most important issue for my foreign readers is that it is no longer true that Korea does not have vicarious liability. The vast majority of scholars, in Korea, believe that a corporation may not be held criminally liable as a principle of a crime. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Korea have agreed with this notion. However, today, many laws contain vicarious liability clauses.
The Constitutional Court of Korea has ruled that these clauses are constitutional if they do not impose strict liability. After the decision many of the laws that contain vicarious liability clauses have been amended to provide that a corporation may not be punished if it has supervised its employees and acted with due care.
Thus, please do yourself and your company a favor and create a transparent compliance system after a complete compliance audit. I see too many companies not willing to have an outsider take a good look and create a transparent, yet, manageable compliance system. The needed compliance audit, never, embarrass the executive management, thus, I am never sure of what the apprehension is of the few companies that choose to forgo the systematic compliance system for risking reputation and employees and management freedom from the clink.
Other articles that may be of interest:
- Compliance Control Standards in Korea: Amended KCC
- Failed Korean Corporate Compliance and the Role of Attorneys
- Keeping your Employees out of the Clink in Korea: Korean Corporate Compliance
Sean Hayes may be contacted at: SeanHayes@ipglegal.com.
Sean Hayes is co-chair of the Korea Practice Team at IPG Legal. He is the only non-Korean to have worked as an attorney for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty.