Brendon Carr has mentioned on his blog that:
“The Korean Constitution recognizes a right to privacy. The US Constitution does not—we come from the proverbial “open society”. While both countries subscribe to the idea that the courts do the people’s business’, Korea is much more conservative about balancing the people’s ownership of the judiciary against the individual’s right to privacy.”
The U.S. does “recognize the right to privacy.” Roe v. Wade is the most noteworthy case concerning the “right to privacy.”
The issue is not simply that the U.S. doesn’t have a right to privacy. The U.S. does. Also, Korea does not have an “absolute” right to privacy – A “Megan Law” was held constitutional by the Constitutional Court.
The issue is fundamentally the balancing of the right, the conception of state action, and the heightened level of protection offered through law, not the constitution, for the protection of privacy.
- U.S. Imposes Steel Tariff on Korean Imports
- Korean Cryptocurrency Case Filed to the Korean Constitutional Court: Korean Bitcoin Updates
- Korea’s Cyber Defamation Law: Basics of Libel and Slander in Korea
- South Koreans Ask U.S. to Reconsider Timing of Military Handoff by Tom Coyner
- Is Korea a Mature Democracy? Why Does it Matter?
- Divorce/Family Lawyers in Korea: Korean Divorce Explained by U.S. Military
- So you Want to Hire a Korean Independent Contractor?
- Korea Legal News for the Week of July 28, 2013
- Challenging a Korean Immigration Deportation/Exit Order in Korea
- Sean Hayes Invited to Chair Panel for Horasis Foundation