This week a Seoul Central District Court awarded damages to Chanel for defamation inflicted on Chanel by a room salon that was branded as Chanel Business Club. The court noted that: “The defendant, by using Chanel’s image for his business which is commonly associated with a negative image, inflicted damage to the brand value of Chanel.” The defendant never responded to the suit.
A room salon is a type of bar where girls entertain men in private rooms by engaging in friendly banter. Some of the clubs allow girls to leave the bar with the bar patrons.
This trend of allowing damage for damage to the business reputation is welcome, however, the damages awarded are, often, so trivial, that few brands are willing to file suit. Chanel seems to want to, merely, warn others from using its brand in a nefarious manner.
The court awarded damages to Chanel in the amount of KRW 10mil (USD 8,900).
_________
Sean Hayes, IPG’s Co-Chair of the Korea Practice Team, may be contacted at: [email protected]
Similar Posts:
- Liquidated Damages vs. Penalty Damages: Korean Contract Law Basics
- Publicity Rights/Portrait Rights in Korea: Entertainment Law Basics in Korea
- Korean Patent Law’s Trade Secret Protection: Amendment to Trade Secret Law in Korea
- Liquidated (Penalty) Damages Necessary in Most Korean NDA and Non-Compete Agreements
- Liquidated Damages v. Penalties in Korean contracts
- How to Successfully Manufacture OEM in Korea: Break Products Down to the Threads
- Protecting Products from Parallel Imports into Korea: Trademark/IP in Korea?
- A “Tasty” Exclusive Agent Agreement for Artists & Entertainers in Korea: Entertainment Law Basics in Korea
- Enforcement of Covenants Not to Compete in Employment Agreements in Korea: Restrictive Covenants in Korea
- Material Breach of Korean Contracts Under Korean Law: Primary Obligations vs. Secondary Obligations in Korea Courts
You must log in to post a comment.