The perils of working in manufacturing companies is, generally, well-known by employees of their companies. Samsung has been targeted, recently, as a company that has not informed workers of the risk at working at their plants.
At my office near Samsung’s office we, regularly, hear the chants from protestors. The majority of the protestors have protested in order claim compensation from Samsung for injuries that were alleged to be caused to workers and the family’s of workers based on exposure to toxic chemicals. A causal relationship is, often, difficult for the plaintiffs to prove, thus, they have turned to political tools at solving a perceived unethical treatment of these employees.
The protest I see the most is a protest concerning the increased risk of contracting leukemia from the chemicals utilized in the semiconductor and cell phone manufacturing processes. Many of the chemicals have been banned in other countries.
In the recent matter, an employee died shortly after being exposed to diluted hydrofluoric acid that was leaking. We may never know how many workers were exposed, but we need to realize and appreciate the significant risk that these workers are exposed to working in these plants.
Prayers go out to the families and congratulations to Samsung for not trying to hide an issue that should be further addressed with the assistance of the incoming administration.
Other articles from the media that may be of interest:
- Samsung agrees to discuss leukemia deaths after six years of denials
- The Dirty and Dangerous Side to Tech
- Samsung Chip Factory Causes Cancer: Korean Government Finds
Sean Hayes may be contacted at: [email protected]
Sean Hayes is co-chair of the Korea Practice Team at IPG Legal. He is the only non-Korean to have worked as an attorney for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty.
- Sad News for a Samsung Worker: Chemical Leak at Hwaseong Plant
- There Goes the Neighborhood: Samsung “Union” Allowed to Protest in Front Of Samsung Headquarters
- Mandatory Retirement Age of 60 may be Mandatory for Most Companies in Korea
- Samsung Investigated for Union Busting by Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor
- Migrant Worker Labor Union Denied Registration in Korea
- Samsung’s Shareholdings Explained by Wall Street Journal
- Amendment to Korea’s Occupational Safety and Health Act in 2019
- Part-time Worker Annual Paid Leave Obligations under the Korean Labor Standards Act
- Verdict in latest Samsung/Apple Courtroom Battle
- Don’t Bet Against Samsung in Korea: Elliott Lost Injunction Case at Korean Court