Supreme Court Decision 97Da19038 delivered on February 27, 1998
【Damages】
Translation of Official Court Summary
a. When a media, such as broadcast etc, defames one by presenting fact, the action has no illegality when the alleged fact is related to a public matter, the presention is intended solely for the public interest, and the alleged fact is proved to be true. In addition, even when the alleged fact is not proved to be true, but the presenter believes that the alleged fact is true and has substantial reasons to believe so, the action shall be deemed to have no criminal or reckless intent.
b. As regard to a defamatory act of the media, to decide whether the presenter has substantial reasons to believe the alleged fact is true or not, the content of the presented fact, certainty of evidence or resources that made the fact be believable, method of expression and other factors shall be all considered. Especially, if the alleged fact is a historical one, the research on the historical fact and freedom of expression shall take priority over the honor of the deceased and his/her family. And in making the decision, it should also be considered that it is difficult to check the truth of the alleged fact, since the objective source to check the truth is limited.
Translations of Korean Court Entertainment Law Cases (Court Summaries)
- Korean Business/Service Marks Protection under the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act
- The Violation of Right of Publicity in Korea: Badminton Player Park Ju-Bong’s Case
- Definition of Defamation in Korea
- Censorship Prohibited in Korea: Korean Entertainment Law Cases
- Definition of Copyright in Korea: Ideas vs. Expressions: Korean Entertainment Law
- Definition of “Author” under Korean Copyright Act: Entertainment Law Cases in Korea
_____
Sean Hayes may be contacted at: SeanHayes@ipglegal.com.
Sean Hayes is co-chair of the Korea Practice Team at IPG Legal. He is the only non-Korean to have worked as an attorney for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty.
Similar Posts:
- Korea’s Cyber Defamation Law: Basics of Libel and Slander in Korea
- Defamation on the Internet is a Criminal Offense in Korea
- Defamation Law Under Korean Law
- Definition of Rape in Korea Elaborated on by the Korean Supreme Court: Criminal Law Basics
- Korean IP Infringement Jurisdiction Centralized at Five Korean District Courts and the Patent Court of Korea: Korean Intellectual Property Case Updates
- Status of Interns Under the Korean Labor Standards Act: Employees Entitled to Severance/Minimum Wage?
- Definition of “Ordinary Wage” in Korea: Korean Employment & Labor Law Basics
- Korea’s Data Privacy and Data Protection Law
- “Fair Use” Korean Copyright law
- Korea’s Class Action Law Proposed by Moon Administration
You must log in to post a comment.