John Lee at The Korean Foreigner has a great post today related to Korea’s step back in time. He, kindly, allowed me to post his article on my blog.
“On December 18th 2014, IKEA, the world’s largest furniture retailer, opened its first Korean branch in Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi Province. The store is 25,759 square-meters (approximately 277,267 square-feet) in size and it is accessible via train and three inter-city express highways. It would appear that IKEA’s business is booming.
So much so that the THREE inter-city express highways that lead to IKEA are congested with cars – all of them customers who want to buy their next furniture item from IKEA.
Apparently, doing well in business is not always a good thing. A little over two weeks after IKEA opened its doors to the public, the Gwangmyeong Municipal City has demanded that IKEA come up with a “dramatic breakthrough” by January 7th 2015 to resolve the problem of the congested roads. The municipal government threatened that if IKEA fails to come up with a solution by that date, the government would withdraw the temporary approval that it gave to IKEA to operate in its city, thus forcing IKEA to shut its doors starting on January 15th 2015.
The Gwangmyeong Municipal City is also pressing the central government to have IKEA registered as a large-scale discount mall, which is currently registered as a mall specializing in furniture. This registration change would force IKEA to shut its doors twice a month on weekends.
Never mind the fact that the Seoul High Court already ruled that that particular regulation was unlawful because “it was difficult to judge if the rules actually helped smaller retailers while limiting consumers’ choice at the same time.”
What is the government proposing that IKEA does? Should IKEA stop being a furniture retailer for a few years and re-brand itself as a construction company that specializes in road expansion? Or should it be a railroad company that focuses on adding and updating Korea’s railway system? Or should it be forced to expand its already huge parking lot, which can house up to 2,000 vehicles?
Or should IKEA be forced to raise its prices? That way, consumers will just stop going to IKEA. Oh, wait. IKEA was already investigated by the Fair Trade Commission for “charging South Korean customers more than it charges buyers in other countries” even before it opened!
President Park Geun-hye can wax poetic about transforming Korea into a creative economy until her face turns blue. The reality that is Korea’s economy says that the government’s rhetoric is just that. Considering the latest attack on IKEA, the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s persecution of Uber, Korea’s ridiculous tariffs on agricultural imports, Korea’s inability to overturn its anachronistic internet laws, Koreans’ overall mercantile mindset, and many other illiberal and anti-globalization tendencies, it is hardly surprising that half of all foreign firms based in Korea plan on leaving Korea sooner rather than later.
Charles de Gaulle was purported to have once said, “Brazil is the country of the future… and always will be.”
Though I am not sure if Charles de Gaulle really did say it, regardless of the authenticity of the source, I cannot think of a more curse-like compliment than that. After all, it is another way of saying that an entire country is forever destined never to fulfill its huge potential. Unless there is a real structural economic reform and a genuine change in the Korean people’s attitudes about free trade, and soon, there is a good chance that that epithet will not apply only to Brazil.”
Sean Hayes may be contacted at: [email protected]
Sean Hayes is co-chair of the Korea Practice Team at IPG Legal. He is the first non-Korean attorney to have worked for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty. Sean is ranked, for Korea, as one of only two non-Korean lawyers as a Top Attorney by AsiaLaw.
- Did Korea Kill Uber? South Korea vs. Uber
- Korean Smart City Opportunities for Foreign and Domestic Companies Doing Business in Korea
- Is Seoul in this heated battle with Uber for no reason other than protecting a vested interest?
- Navigating the Korean Bureaucracy one Beer at a Time
- Korean Currency Control Laws Revised: Korea Won – Yuan
- Sean Hayes attended the Korea Business Forum
- Korean IP Infringement Jurisdiction Centralized at Five Korean District Courts and the Patent Court of Korea: Korean Intellectual Property Case Updates
- “Fine Dust” as Socially-Generated Natural Disaster – Amendment to the Framework Act on the Management of Disasters and Safety 2019
- Barriers to Trade in the Korean Franchising Industry
- Non-Acceptance of Government Report Grounds for an Appeal to Korean Court