Over the past decade, Korea has liberalized its government permit system and has required, in many more instances, only a report or notification to be filed with the government for many activities that previously required approval of a relevant Korean government authority.
Even with the change, however, the Korean bureaucracy has, often, been unwilling to give up its power and has simply rejected reports, thus, in reality rejecting the anticipated activity.
In a Supreme Court case handed down late last year (2008 Du 167), the Supreme Court of Korea ruled in a case concerning a construction report, that the non-acceptance of the report is justifiable grounds for an appeal of the non-acceptance to court.
This development is a welcomed sign for developers and other that are often stymied by a bureaucracy with too much time and not enough business sense.
Similar Posts:
- Duty to Report Product Defects in Korea
- Definition of Rape in Korea Elaborated on by the Korean Supreme Court: Criminal Law Basics
- Korean Cryptocurrency Case Filed to the Korean Constitutional Court: Korean Bitcoin Updates
- Licensee has Standing to Challenge the Validity of a Patent in Korea. Korean Licensing & Royalty Law Updates
- Korean Trust Act of 1961 Amended
- Korean Entrapment Law: Korean Criminal Procedure Law Basics
- Suing the Korean Government in Court Abroad: The Ashley Madison Saga Begins
- South Korean Act on International Judicial Mutual Assistance in Civil Matters: Obtaining Evidence via Korean Courts and the Korean Government for use in Proceedings Abroad
- Korea to Rule if Pokémon GO Can Be Released Nationally in Korea
- Ordinary Wages and the Principle of Good Faith in Korea: How long should the principle be applied to Korean CBAs?
You must log in to post a comment.