As many of the readers of this blog know, I worked for the Constitutional Court of Korea. One of the Korean attorneys at our Firm, also, worked for the Court. No surprise for us in this decision.
Anti-smoking activists lost a challenge to a law that regulates and allows the manufacture and sale of tobacco in Korea. The activists intent in the challenge is to completely ban the manufacture and sale of tobacco in Korea.
On May 11, 2015, The Constitutional Court, in a 7-2 opinion opined that: “It is difficult to tell if a strong correlation between habitual smoking and lung cancer exists.” The Court went on to note that: “Even if a correlation exists, it is not strong enough to force the government to step in to ban tobacco businesses because lung cancer stems from diverse factors.”
The Court, correctly, noted that the government is engaged in many measures to discourage the consumption of tobacco and limit the exposure of non-smokers to smoking. These measures have been challenged, also, at various courts by smoking advocates.
___
Sean Hayes may be contacted at: SeanHayes@ipglegal.com.
Sean Hayes is co-chair of the Korea Practice Team at IPG Legal. He is the first non-Korean attorney to have worked for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty. Sean is ranked, for Korea, as one of only two non-Korean lawyers as a Top Attorney by AsiaLaw.
Sean profile may be found at: Sean C. Hayes
Similar Posts:
- How I Discovered that Smoking Weed is Legal in North Korea – by Tom Coyner
- How I Discovered that Smoking Weed is Legal in North Korea – by Tom Coyner
- Constitutional Court of Korea Declares Real Name Verification Unconstitutional
- South Korea’s Adultery Law found Unconstitutional by Constitutional Court of Korea – Let the Parties Begin
- The Business of Politics in Korea: Understanding the Radical Left in Korea by Tom Coyner
- Establishing a Manufacturing Business in South Korea: Top 14 Things to Know Before you Go