The Korean Supreme Court ruled, in March of 2018, that a company may terminate employees for one incident of employee gambling. The case stems from the termination of drivers that were caught on one occasion gambling prior to driving buses.
The lower courts ruled, in short, that gambling was not a serious enough offense to justify termination since:
- The act of gambling, only, occurred on one occasion and thus trust between the employee and employer has not broken down;
- The employees performed their job functions adequately; and
- The non-termination of employment of the employees would not significantly interfere with the ability of the employer to successful continue its business- if the employees do not engage in these acts in the future.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the lower court and noted that:
- Gambling could effect the rest period of the drivers and the job of the drivers requires rest in order for the drivers to maintain the safety of passengers;
- Gambling consumes mental and physical energy and is a task that, in of itself, may lead to a much less rested driver;
- The employees may have gambled into the night and late into the morning prior to their shifts, thus, causing a substantial likelihood of causing drivers to lack adequate rest; and
- The employees agreed, via a collective bargaining agreement, that gambling is grounds for termination and thus were aware of the ramifications for gambling.
We advise noting specific actions that is conduct that shall not be tolerated by company employees. Because of recent changes in law we, highly, recommend an HR and a revision to your Employment Rules and an update to your employment education programs.
- Must I grant Male Employees Maternity/Paternity Leave in Korea?: Korean Labor/Employment Law Updates
- Civil Liability of Companies for Actions of Employees Off the Company Property and After Work Hours
- Voluntary Resignation of an Employee in Korea: Employment Law Updates
- Transfer of Employee in Korea to Lower Position in Company May not be Wrongful Termination: Seoul High Court Precedence
- “Cause” Needed to Terminate During Probationary Period in Korea?
- Unfair/Wrongful Dismissal of Foreign Executives under Term Contract with Korean Chaebols
- Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Agreements in Korea
- Can you Revise Employment Rules in Korea without the Agreement of Employees?
- Non-Registered Company Director (Executive Director/Senior Managerial Worker) in Korea deemed Employee under Korean Labor & Employment Law
- Enforcement of Covenants Not to Compete in Employment Agreements in Korea: Restrictive Covenants in Korea