IPG has handled numerous medical malpractice matters for plaintiffs and defendants of medical malpractice cases in Korea in Seoul courts and we were, prior, to having knowledge of the composition of the new Korean Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency very pessimistic about its usefulness for plaintiffs.
When we first heard about the enactment of the new Korean medical malpractice law we were skeptical if the system would be useful for plaintiffs, since, often, the court and prosecutors are able to assert more pressure on doctors than this Commission and worried that this agency would be dominated by doctors.
However, after a discussion with one of the standing commissioners of the Korean Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency, who we know well and who we worked with in the past, we have come to realize that the composition of the panel lends itself to providing a fair forum for both doctors and patient plaintiffs.
In many cases, the court may be the best option for a plaintiffs, however, this agency may be more suited in handling the more complex matters, because of the nature of the Korean courts.
We will be writing more articles on medical malpractice in Korea over the next few weeks.
- Medical Malpractice Arbitration System in Korea: A Good Option for Many Plaintiffs
- Korean Medical Malpractice Arbitration Law
- Arbitration against Korean Government Agencies in Korea: Korean Arbitration Law Basics.
- English-Speaking Arbitration Attorneys in Korea
- Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korean Courts: Arbitration Law Basics
- Korea’s Medical Devices Act Amendment: Monetary and Monetary-Like Benefits to Healthcare Workers
- Arbitration in Korea under the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board: International Arbitration Rules
- U.S. Court Refuses to Enforce Taiwan Arbitral Award: Lesson for Drafting Arbitration Clauses in Korea
- Korean Governmental Regulations Stifle Innovations and the Role of Korean Law Firms
- Establishing Business with Korea via an Agent: Korean Agency Law Basics