Korean Workplace Discrimination Laws

There are numerous Korean labor and employment laws that prohibit employers from discriminating against their employees in a Korean workplace. These Korean workplace discrimination laws are found in a myriad of Korean statutes and regulations. This article on Korea’s discrimination laws provides a quick guide to where employers and employees can locate the basic requirements under Korean law.

The major pieces of legislation are the following: the Korean Labor Standards Act; the Korean Equal Employment Opportunity Act; the Korean Fixed-term Workers Act; and the Act on Prohibition of Age Discrimination in Employment and Elderly Employment Promotion of Korea.

Korean Workplace discrimination law

Korean Workplace Discrimination Laws

The Labor Standards Act of Korea

The Labor Standards Act (“LSA”) is one of the primary sources of labor and employment law in Korea, providing minimum standards for the conditions of all employment. As far as discrimination is concerned, Article 6 of the LSA prohibits employers in Korea from discriminating based on gender. The Korean Labor Standards Act further prohibits employers from discriminating against employees in the workplace in Korea based on nationality, religion, or social status. For an article on what constitutes an “Employee” under Korean Law, please see: Definition of an Employee under Korean Law.

Equal Employment Opportunity Act of Korea

The primary purpose of the Korean Equal Employment Opportunity Act passed originally in 1987, was to ensure equal opportunity and treatment of men and women in employment. Specifically, Article 7(1) prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of gender in the recruitment or hiring processes. Article 8(1) also prohibits gender-based wage discrimination by requiring employers to provide equal pay for equal work performed within the same business.

Fixed-term Workers Act of Korea

The Korean Fixed-term Workers Act, first passed by the National Assembly in 2006, set out to eliminate undue discrimination against part-time, fixed-term, or any non-permanent employees and improve their overall working conditions. Article 8(1) prohibits employers from discriminating between employees who have permanent positions as opposed to those who have indefinite employment positions if they are in the same business or workplace or if they have the same or similar positions.

Age Discrimination Act of Korea

The Korean Age Discrimination Act was passed in 1999. Korea’s Age Discrimination Act was ratified to contribute to the job security of the elderly and enable suitable employment opportunities for a rapidly aging Korean society. Article 4-4(1) of the Age Discrimination Act of Korea prevents employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of age without justifiable grounds. The scope of the law covers matters related to recruitment and employment; wage and welfare benefits; education and training; job placement, transfer, or promotion; and retirement and dismissal.

Burden of Proof/Compensatory Damages in Korea

Generally, it is the employer who has the burden to prove that the employee has either not been discriminated against or that the discrimination was justifiable under the law. Article 30 of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of Korea explicitly states that the “burden of proof is shifted to the employers when resolving disputes arising out of this Act.”

As far as damages are concerned, Article 9(1) of the Fixed-term Workers Act of Korea does enable victims of discrimination to file a petition for a corrective order. However, the Korean Labor Standards Act, Korean Equal Employment Opportunity Act, and Korean Age Discrimination Act do not expressly provide avenues for relief outside of the normal, legal channels.

Thus, remedying the alleged violation of law can be achieved by filing a complaint with the Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor, initiating a civil lawsuit in the Korean courts, or submitting a criminal complaint to the Korean investigative authorities.

Recently, the Supreme Court of Korea ruled that, under Article 8 of the Korean Equal Employment Act, an employer in Korea is responsible for compensating a female employee who is a victim of wage discrimination for the damages she suffered. The calculation was based on the wages she would have received had she not faced the discrimination. However, for an employer, this is not the only detriment to the employer. The Korean Ministry of Employment & Labor may impose labor audits, raids, and impose administrative fines.

If you are dealing with a workplace discrimination case and need legal advice on the matter, please feel free to Schedule a Call with an Attorney.

by Sean Hayes

Sean Hayes is the first non-Korean attorney to have worked for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty. Sean is ranked, for Korea, as one of only a few non-Korean lawyers as a Top Attorney by AsiaLaw. Sean is regularly quoted by leading international media sources, including the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, France 24, and Bloomberg.

IPG Legal is consistently ranked a Top Dispute Resolution Law Firm for our litigation, arbitration, and mediation services, and IPG Legal is consistently rated a top-tier law firm in corporate law, litigation, arbitration, franchise law, distribution law, estate law, family law, employment & labor law, and criminal defense.

To schedule a call with Sean Hayes, please Schedule a Call Here. 


Discover more from The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal Law Firm

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply