How to Enforce a Foreign Judgment in Korean Courts?

If you have obtained a favorable judgment from a foreign court (court not in Korea), but the defendant is a Korean individual or company with assets in Korea, it is, typically, essential to enforce the judgment in Korea. This requires localizing the foreign judgment through a process called the “Execution of Judgment” under Korea’s Civil Execution Act: Article 27. For an articleon filing a lawsuit for a debt in Korea see: How Foreign Companies and Individuals can Collect Debts in Korea.

Supreme Court in Kyodae

In general, to enforce a foreign judgment in Korea, the defendant:
A. Must have had an opportunity to be heard;
B. Must have been properly served; and
C. The judgment must be a “final and conclusive judgment.”

More specifically, to enforce a foreign judgment in Korea, the following conditions must be met:

  1. International Jurisdiction: The foreign court must have had appropriate jurisdiction over the matter.
  2. Proper Service of Process: The defendant must have been properly served with the judgment through an official court process. In most cases, services must be via an international treaty on the service of process called the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Hague Convention on the Service of Process”). The procedure to serve under the Hague Convention on the Service of Process may be found at: International Service of Process. In some cases, the formalities of the Hague Convention do not need to be met.
  3. Compliance with Public Policy: The final judgment must not violate Korea’s public policy, morality, or social order. This is a catch-all rule that has been applied to not enforce punitive damage awards and some judgments that were deemed to be obtained in a fraudulent manner.
  4. Reciprocity: There must be a mutual guarantee between the foreign court and the Korean court, meaning the legal systems of both countries should not be significantly different, and there is reciprocal recognition of judgments.

Failure to meet any of these criteria may lead the Korean court to refuse enforcement. Moreover, securing enforcement of foreign judgments that significantly exceed typical awards in Korea can be particularly challenging. Even experienced Korean legal practitioners often find it difficult to persuade Korean courts when foreign judgments involve large sums.

Recently, IPG Legal executed a foreign judgment exceeding $3,000,000—well above the standard typically awarded by Korean courts. With over 20 years of experience handling foreign cases, IPG Legal has demonstrated the expertise necessary to navigate the complexities of enforcing foreign judgments in Korea, securing favorable outcomes even in challenging circumstances.

Civil Execution Act Article 27 (Execution of Judgment) 
(1) A judgment of execution shall be made without making any examination as to whether the judgment is right or wrong.
(2) A lawsuit seeking a judgment of execution shall be dismissed without prejudice if it falls under any of the following:  <Amended by Act No. 12588, May 20, 2014> 1. When it has not been proved that the final and conclusive judgment, etc. of a foreign court has become final and conclusive; 2. When the final and conclusive judgment, etc. of a foreign court fails to fulfill the conditions under Article 217 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Civil Procedure Act Article 217 (Recognition of Foreign Country Judgments)  
(1) A final and conclusive judgment rendered by a foreign court or a judgment acknowledged to have the same force (hereinafter referred to as “final judgment, etc.”) shall be recognized, if all of the following requirements are met: 1. That the international jurisdiction of such foreign court is recognized under the principle of international jurisdiction pursuant to the statutes or treaties of the Republic of Korea; 2. That a defeated defendant is served, by a lawful method, a written complaint or document corresponding thereto, and notification of date or written order allowing him/her sufficient time to defend (excluding cases of service by public notice or similar), or that he/she responds to the lawsuit even without having been served such documents; 3. That the approval of such final judgment, etc. does not undermine sound morals or other social order of the Republic of Korea in light of the contents of such final judgment, etc. and judicial procedures; 4. That mutual guarantee exists, or the requirements for recognition of final judgment, etc. in the Republic of Korea and the foreign country to which the foreign country court belongs are not far off balance and have no actual difference between each other in important points.
(2) A court shall ex officio investigate whether the requirements under paragraph (1) are satisfied.

by Mina KIM

You may schedule a call with an attorney at: Schedule a Call.


Discover more from The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal Law Firm

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply