Legality of Grey Market Imports in Korea
“As a consequence, in spite of the Exclusive Importer’s agreement with the Original Manufacturer that guarantees the exclusive right to Import to the Exclusive Importer, parallel importing does not constitute a violation of Korean Laws and the Parallel Importer is not bound by the contractual rights and obligations granted and imposed by the exclusivity agreement between the Sole Importer and the Original Manufacturer.”

Simply, the argument is that the Parallel Importer is not a party to the contract, and no other Korean Law is violated. Most jurisdictions have reached similar conclusions.
Exceptions, however, do exist. For example, if the grey market goods are materially different (e.g., warranty terms, product labeling, or specifications) or if their sale misleads consumers about origin or affiliation, this may violate the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act of Korea or the Korean Trademark Act.
Please note that, in compliance with Korean Law and business practices, exporters and importers may take creative and proactive measures to assist in alleviating the impact of grey market products entering the market. Schedule a time to speak with me, and we can discuss options and a path forward.
Sean’s profile may be found at Sean C. Hayes. To schedule a call with Sean Hayes, please click: Schedule a Call with Sean Hayes.
Sean Hayes is the first non-Korean attorney to have worked for the Korean court system (Constitutional Court of Korea) and one of the first non-Koreans to be a regular member of a Korean law faculty. He assists clients in their contentious, non-contentious, and business development needs. Sean is rated a Top 100 attorney, and his firm was rated a top dispute resolution law firm for Korea.
Discover more from The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal Law Firm
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
